Kurup, 47, discovered that he was having trouble reading long sentences with multiple, winding clauses full of background information. Online sentences tend to be shorter, and the ones containing complicated information tend to link to helpful background material.

I just this week remarked (on Facebook and on Twitter) that writing in an academic context is showing me just how well honed my blogging habits are, because they’re pretty much opposites.

I once explained to a long-time journalist who was new to editing an online news publication that writing for the web is its own style. Preserving formatting and links when quoting or cross-posting other online sources is critical to proper attribution, unless there is permission given to alter the text, via licensing or editorial agreement. It’s possible, especially where links are concerned, that the original author’s style choice was deliberate.

It’s interesting to think about the different ways in which this web-oriented style of writing plays out. Some of it is visual elements like bold and italics (sorry, strength and emphasis), links, and headings. Some of it is the informational elements, like short paragraphs, bulleted lists, and headings. What’s currently considered best practice for anything that falls under the guise of “content” completely facilitates this scanning practice. Search engines in fact reward you for breaking up your writing with headings.

I’ve been completely immersed in my master’s thesis draft for the last three days. I would love to be able to just pull a blockquote from an article. Or to have a paragraph with just a couple sentences. Or to link to a related source instead of spending a paragraph explaining what it says. But, thinking about the couple of articles I just read on business speak and how not to use it, I can see how it’s also easy to get caught up in academic speak.

Now I understand why my academic friend’s blog posts on her consulting website look the way they do. The paragraphs are long and there are many of them. They are dense with valuable information. You have to really pay attention to follow them. They make for great chapters and really not so great blog posts. I’ve mentioned headings, but short of an editorial workflow intervention, I don’t think that’s going to happen, because that’s a learned style of writing. But aside from the SEO advantages, now I’m thinking that it may be better to leave well enough alone. But I don’t want a principled argument on neuropathway development to prevent her content from being accessible, either.

I totally stopped in the middle of reading this article to start this blog post.

Wolf, one of the world’s foremost experts on the study of reading, was startled last year to discover her brain was apparently adapting, too. After a day of scrolling through the Web and hundreds of e-mails, she sat down one evening to read Hermann Hesse’s “The Glass Bead Game.”

“I’m not kidding: I couldn’t do it,” she said. “It was torture getting through the first page. I couldn’t force myself to slow down so that I wasn’t skimming, picking out key words, organizing my eye movements to generate the most information at the highest speed. I was so disgusted with myself.”

I have absolutely noticed that I tend to read and scroll at the same time. It feels terrible in my brain. I know what my brain feels like when it’s overwhelmed and tired, and that’s the same feeling as when I’m trying to read and scroll simultaneously. So I have at least tried to stop doing that, and make as much use of Evernote’s Clearly plugin for my browser as possible, so I get an Instapaper-ish screen to read from without all the visual noise. On the desktop anyway. That’s much harder to do on mobile, especially while scrolling through tweets.

I have made it a goal, last year and now this year, to read more books. I enjoy it. It feels good. This is reminding me just how important that is.

I completely overthought how I constructed these paragraphs.

Serious reading takes a hit from online scanning and skimming, researchers say

Link

Journal of Emerging Investigators

JEI is a scientific journal for middle and high school students. They recently published an article in which it is determined that printing costs due to ink can be reduced by approximately one-third by switching from Times New Roman to Garamond.

Older men in tech are discovering the unseen work that women and people of color have done for decades. Fitting in is hard work — an additional, invisible task on the daily to-do list.

Rather than offer tips to older male entrepreneurs, the chroniclers of Silicon Valley ageism make a case that the industry is what needs to change. The tech world, which counts innovation and creativity among its core values, has created a culture of unparalleled uniformity. The appearance of daring (look — that co-founder is so young he doesn’t even need to shave every day!) has proved more alluring than actual diversity of background and experience. And this casual discrimination has been bad for business. Both pieces point out that consumers lose as a result of the industry’s narrow view of who’s got good ideas.

When it’s men who are confronted by biases, we look at the bigger system. When women are, we put the onus on them to get ahead. And when it’s people of color facing bias? Well, that story is so familiar it barely makes headlines anymore. Journalists are paying attention to ageism in tech because it’s a new story that older white men, traditionally a very powerful demographic in the white-collar world, are struggling with how to succeed in a collarless culture that claims to reward merit but rejects them due to factors beyond their control.

If it results in progress, that’s great. Color me skeptical, though. I still don’t quite believe that the balance of power has really shifted that much from older to younger.

Silicon Valley Disrupts Discrimination: Now It’s for Middle-Aged White Guys, Too